All rankings in college football are subjective, so there is no right or wrong answer, but some systems are more right than others. The Best Possible Ranking (BPR) is, quite simply, the most right possible.
Why? The BPR ranks teams only on wins and losses and the difficulty of their schedule, but does so with minimal data loss. It achieves this through a two step process. First, teams are power-rated using wins and losses, margin of victory (MOV), total yards, turnovers, yards per play, etc. Second, power-ratings are used to evaluate a team's schedule and estimate the difficulty of achieving a team's win/loss record given that schedule. Consequently, each team is ranked exclusively on its wins and losses - that is, of course, the point of sport - but we can better assess the value of those wins. Unlike other non-MOV systems - I use all available data.
The first step in the BPR is important, but not unique. There are literally hundreds of systems for statistically rating teams. The key to the BPR is in the second step. It is motivated by this concept - if team B were to play team A's schedule, what is the probability that B would win more games, the same number of games or fewer games than A.
In the chart above, each line represents a max win frontier. Moving up the y-axis is the probability that the event will occur and across the bottom is the probability that a team will win each game on the schedule (for the sake of this example, we are assuming that the schedule is made up of 12 identical opponents). As we move to the right, the wins come easier, and as we move up the event is more likely. The "event" is the team winning that many games or more. Consequently, lines curve up as we slide to the right - the probability of winning at least that many games increases as the games get easier.
If we were to draw a line horizontally across the chart, any intersecting point would represent an equally likely event. This fact allows us to make some interesting comparisons. For example, as highlighted, it is equally difficult to go undefeated against a schedule of teams you would normally beat 90% of the time (favored by around17.4 points, see chart at bottom) as it is to win at least 11 games against a schedule of teams you would beat 80% of the time (favored by around 11.3). Likewise, it is equally likely that a team will win 1 or more of 12 games against teams it has a 15% chance of beating and that a team will win 4 or more of 12 games against teams it has a 45% chance of beating.
What does this mean? If we have a reliable system for generating power ratings (power ratings are an objective fact, though impossibly difficult to actually measure), and we reduce a team's accomplishments to its wins and losses given the strength of its schedule, we can mathematically, and objectively, deduce national rankings.
It is, quite simply, the Best Possible Ranking.
BPR | A system for ranking teams based only one wins and losses and strength of schedule. See BPR for an explanation. |
EPA (Expected Points Added) | Expected points are the points a team can "expect" to score based on the distance to the end zone and down and distance needed for a first down, with an adjustment for the amount of time remaining in some situations. Expected points for every situation is estimated using seven years of historical data. The expected points considers both the average points the offense scores in each scenario and the average number of points the other team scores on their ensuing possession. The Expected Points Added is the change in expected points before and after a play. |
EP3 (Effective Points Per Possession) | Effective Points Per Possession is based on the same logic as the EPA, except it focuses on the expected points added at the beginning and end of an offensive drive. In other words, the EP3 for a single drive is equal to the sum of the expected points added for every offensive play in a drive (EP3 does not include punts and field goal attempts). We can also think of the EP3 as points scored+expected points from a field goal+the value of field position change on the opponent's next possession. |
Adjusted for Competition | We attempt to adjust some statistics to compensate for differences in strength of schedule. While the exact approach varies some from stat to stat the basic concept is the same. We use an algorithm to estimate scores for all teams on both sides of the ball (e.g., offense and defense) that best predict real results. For example, we give every team an offensive and defensive yards per carry score. Subtracting the offensive score from the defensive score for two opposing teams will estimate the yards per carry if the two teams were to play. Generally, the defensive scores average to zero while offensive scores average to the national average, e.g., yards per carry, so we call the offensive score "adjusted for competition" and roughly reflects what the team would do against average competition |
Impact | see Adjusted for Competition. Impact scores are generally used to evaluate defenses. The value roughly reflects how much better or worse a team can expect to do against this opponent than against the average opponent. |
[-] About this table
Includes the
top 180 QBs by total plays
Total <=0 | Percent of plays that are negative or no gain |
Total >=10 | Percent of plays that gain 10 or more yards |
Total >=25 | Percent of plays that gain 25 or more yards |
10 to 0 | Ratio of Total >=10 to Total <=0 |
Includes the
top 240 RBs by total plays
Total <=0 | Percent of plays that are negative or no gain |
Total >=10 | Percent of plays that gain 10 or more yards |
Total >=25 | Percent of plays that gain 25 or more yards |
10 to 0 | Ratio of Total >=10 to Total <=0 |
Includes the
top 300 Receivers by total plays
Total <=0 | Percent of plays that are negative or no gain |
Total >=10 | Percent of plays that gain 10 or more yards |
Total >=25 | Percent of plays that gain 25 or more yards |
10 to 0 | Ratio of Total >=10 to Total <=0 |
Includes
the
top 180 players by pass attempts)
3rdLComp% |
Completion % on 3rd and long (7+
yards) |
SitComp% |
Standardized completion % for
down and distance. Completion % by down and distance are weighted by
the national average of pass plays by down and distance. |
Pass <=0 | Percent of pass plays that are negative or no gain |
Pass >=10 | Percent of pass plays that gain 10 or more yards |
Pass >=25 | Percent of pass plays that gain 25 or more yards |
10 to 0 | Ratio of Pass >=10 to Pass<=0 |
%Sacks |
Ratio of sacks to pass plays |
Bad INTs |
Interceptions on 1st or 2nd down
early before the last minute of the half |
Includes the top 240 players by carries
YPC1stD |
Yards per carry on 1st down |
CPCs |
Conversions (1st down/TD) per
carry in short yardage situations - the team 3 or fewer yards for a 1st
down or touchdown |
%Team Run |
Player's carries as a percent of team's carries |
%Team RunS |
Player's carries as a percent of team's carries in short
yardage situations |
Run <=0 |
Percent of running plays that
are negative or no gain |
Run >=10 |
Percent of running plays that
gain 10 or more yards |
Run >=25 | Percent of running plays that gain 25 or more yards |
10 to 0 | Ratio of Run >=10 to Run <=0 |
Includes the top 300 players by targets
Conv/T 3rd | Conversions per target on 3rd Downs |
Conv/T PZ | Touchdowns per target inside the 10 yardline |
%Team PZ | Percent of team's targets inside the 10 yardline |
Rec <=0 | Percent of targets that go for negative yards or no net gain |
Rec >=10 | Percent of targets that go for 10+ yards |
Rec >=25 | Percent of targets that go for 25+ yards |
10 to 0 | Ratio of Rec>=0 to Rec<=0 |
Includes the top 300 players by targets
xxxx | xxxx |
...
Includes players with a significant number of attempts
NEPA | "Net Expected Points Added": (expected points after play - expected points before play)-(opponent's expected points after play - opponent's expected points before play). Uses the expected points for the current possession and the opponent's next possession based on down, distance and spot |
NEPA/PP | Average NEPA per play |
Max/Min | Single game high and low |
Includes players with a significant number of attempts
NEPA | "Net Expected Points Added": (expected points after play - expected points before play)-(opponent's expected points after play - opponent's expected points before play). Uses the expected points for the current possession and the opponent's next possession based on down, distance and spot |
NEPA/PP | Average NEPA per play |
Max/Min | Single game high and low |
Adjusted | Reports the per game EPA adjusted for the strength of schedule. |
Defensive Possession Stats
Points/Poss | Offensive points per possession |
EP3 | Effective Points per Possession |
EP3+ | Effective Points per Possession impact |
Plays/Poss | Plays per possession |
Yards/Poss | Yards per possession |
Start Spot | Average starting field position |
Time of Poss | Average time of possession (in seconds) |
TD/Poss | Touchdowns per possession |
TO/Poss | Turnovers per possession |
FGA/Poss | Attempted field goals per possession |
%RZ | Red zone trips per possession |
Points/RZ | Average points per red zone trip. Field Goals are included using expected points, not actual points. |
TD/RZ | Touchdowns per red zone trip |
FGA/RZ | Field goal attempt per red zone trip |
Downs/RZ | Turnover on downs per red zone trip |
Defensive Play-by-Play Stats
EPA/Pass | Expected Points Added per pass attempt |
EPA/Rush | Expected Points Added per rush attempt |
EPA/Pass+ | Expected Points Added per pass attempt impact |
EPA/Rush+ | Expected Points Added per rush attempt impact |
Yards/Pass | Yards per pass |
Yards/Rush | Yards per rush |
Yards/Pass+ | Yards per pass impact |
Yards/Rush+ | Yards per rush impact |
Exp/Pass | Explosive plays (25+ yards) per pass |
Exp/Rush | Explosive plays (25+ yards) per rush |
Exp/Pass+ | Explosive plays (25+ yards) per pass impact |
Exp/Rush+ | Explosive plays (25+ yards) per rush impact |
Comp% | Completion percentage |
Comp%+ | Completion percentage impact |
Yards/Comp | Yards per completion |
Sack/Pass | Sacks per pass |
Sack/Pass+ | Sacks per pass impact |
Sack/Pass* | Sacks per pass on passing downs |
INT/Pass | Interceptions per pass |
Neg/Rush | Negative plays (<=0) per rush |
Neg/Run+ | Negative plays (<=0) per rush impact |
Run Short | % Runs in short yardage situations |
Convert% | 3rd/4th down conversions |
Conv%* | 3rd/4th down conversions versus average by distance |
Conv%+ | 3rd/4th down conversions versus average by distance impact |
Offensive Play-by-Play Stats
Plays | Number of offensive plays |
%Pass | Percent pass plays |
EPA/Pass | Expected Points Added per pass attempt |
EPA/Rush | Expected Points Added per rush attempt |
EPA/Pass+ | Expected Points Added per pass attempt adjusted for competition |
EPA/Rush+ | Expected Points Added per rush attempt adjusted for competition |
Yards/Pass | Yards per pass |
Yards/Rush | Yards per rush |
Yards/Pass+ | Yards per pass adjusted for competition |
Yards/Rush+ | Yards per rush adjusted for competition |
Exp Pass | Explosive plays (25+ yards) per pass |
Exp Run | Explosive plays (25+ yards) per rush |
Exp Pass+ | Explosive plays (25+ yards) per pass adjusted for competition |
Exp Run+ | Explosive plays (25+ yards) per rush adjusted for competition |
Comp% | Completion percentage |
Comp%+ | Completion percentage adjusted for competition |
Sack/Pass | Sacks per pass |
Sack/Pass+ | Sacks per pass adjusted for competition |
Sack/Pass* | Sacks per pass on passing downs |
Int/Pass | Interceptions per pass |
Neg/Run | Negative plays (<=0) per rush |
Neg/Run+ | Negative plays (<=0) per rush adjusted for competition |
Run Short | % Runs in short yardage situations |
Convert% | 3rd/4th down conversions |
Conv%* | 3rd/4th down conversions versus average by distance |
Conv%+ | 3rd/4th down conversions versus average by distance adjusted for competition |
Offensive Possession Stats
Points/Poss | Offensive points per possession |
EP3 | Effective Points per Possession |
EP3+ | Effective Points per Possession adjusted for competition |
Plays/Poss | Plays per possession |
Yards/Poss | Yards per possession |
Start Spot | Average starting field position |
Time of Poss | Average time of possession (in seconds) |
TD/Poss | Touchdowns per possession |
TO/Poss | Turnovers per possession |
FGA/Poss | Attempted field goals per possession |
Poss/Game | Possessions per game |
%RZ | Red zone trips per possession |
Points/RZ | Average points per red zone trip. Field Goals are included using expected points, not actual points. |
TD/RZ | Touchdowns per red zone trip |
FGA/RZ | Field goal attempt per red zone trip |
Downs/RZ | Turnover on downs per red zone trip |
PPP | Points per Possession |
aPPP | Points per Possession allowed |
PPE | Points per Exchange (PPP-aPPP) |
EP3+ | Expected Points per Possession |
aEP3+ | Expected Points per Possession allowed |
EP2E+ | Expected Points per Exchange |
EPA/Pass+ | Expected Points Added per Pass |
EPA/Rush+ | Expected Points Added per Rush |
aEPA/Pass+ | Expected Points Allowed per Pass |
aEPA/Rush+ | Expected Points Allowed per Rush |
Exp/Pass | Explosive Plays per Pass |
Exp/Rush | Explosive Plays per Rush |
aExp/Pass | Explosive Plays per Pass allowed |
aExp/Rush | Explosive Plays per Rush allowed |
BPR | A method for ranking conferences based only on their wins and losses and the strength of schedule. See BPR for an explanation. |
Power | A composite measure that is the best predictor of future game outcomes, averaged across all teams in the conference |
P-Top | The power ranking of the top teams in the conference |
P-Mid | The power ranking of the middling teams in the conference |
P-Bot | The power ranking of the worst teams in the conference |
SOS-Und | Strength of Schedule - Undefeated. Focuses on the difficulty of going undefeated, averaged across teams in the conference |
SOS-BE | Strength of Schedule - Bowl Eligible. Focuses on the difficulty of becoming bowl eligible, averaged across teams in the conference |
Hybrid | A composite measure that quantifies human polls, applied to converences |
Player Game Log
Use the yellow, red and green cells to filter values. Yellow cells filter for exact matches, green cells for greater values and red cells for lesser values. By default, the table is filtered to only the top 200 defense-independent performances (oEPA). The table includes the 5,000 most important performances (positive and negative) by EPA.
Use the yellow, red and green cells to filter values. Yellow cells filter for exact matches, green cells for greater values and red cells for lesser values. By default, the table is filtered to only the top 200 defense-independent performances (oEPA). The table includes the 5,000 most important performances (positive and negative) by EPA.
EPA | Expected points added (see glossary) |
oEPA | Defense-independent performance |
Team Game Log
Use the yellow, red and green cells to filter values. Yellow cells filter for exact matches, green cells for greater values and red cells for lesser values.
Use the yellow, red and green cells to filter values. Yellow cells filter for exact matches, green cells for greater values and red cells for lesser values.
EP3 | Effective points per possession (see glossary) |
oEP3 | Defense-independent offensive performance |
dEP3 | Offense-independent defensive performance |
EPA | Expected points added (see glossary) |
oEPA | Defense-independent offensive performance |
dEPA | Offense-independent defensive performance |
EPAp | Expected points added per play |
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
coach factory outlet
ReplyDeletelouis vuitton handbags
rolex submariner watches
jordan 4 toro
oakley sunglasses
gucci handbags
kate spade
tods outlet
louis vuitton outlet
tory burch outlet
louis vuitton
jordan 6
adidas shoes
hermes birkin bag
louis vuitton outlet online
polo ralph lauren outlet
michael kors outlet
jordan 4
replica watches
louis vuitton outlet
ray-ban sunglasses
jordans
air jordan 13
longchamp handbags
toms outlet
louis vuitton handbags
jordan retro
coach outlet store online
toms shoes
adidas uk
christian louboutin chaussures
ralph lauren uk
coach outlet store online
adidas ultra boost
kate spade
kate spade outlet
coach factory outlet
coach factory outlet
toms shoes
oakley vault
chenlina20160802
ugg slippers clearance
ReplyDeletelouis vuitton outlet online
ugg outlet online clearance
cheap nhl jerseys
beats headphones
adidas originals superstar
moncler pas cher
ray ban sunglasses outlet
montblanc pens
clippers jerseys
201610.7chenjinyan
michael kors outlet
ReplyDeletemichael kors outlet clearance
ralph lauren uk
polo outlet
ray ban wayfarer
mont blanc pens
canada goose outlet
adidas ultra boost
coach canada
coach factory outlet
yaoxuemei20180115
Awesome article, it was exceptionally helpful! I simply began in this and I'm becoming more acquainted with it better! Cheers, keep doing awesome! bxh
ReplyDeletePerforming well on your soccer practice is important if you want to play well in your regular soccer games. However, there are some points that you need to keep in mind while practicing and this article will help you with that. Be focused - This is vital for your soccer development and you really need to take this advice seriously.daily predictions
ReplyDeletePlease share more like that. https://ngoac.net/xem/highlight.html
ReplyDeleteThis is my first time i visit here and I found so many interesting stuff in your blog especially it's discussion, thank you. SEO
ReplyDeleteIn the chart above, each line represents a max win frontier. Moving up the y-axis is the probability that the event will occur and across the bottom is the probability that a team will win each game on the schedule (for the sake of this example, we are assuming that the schedule is made up of 12 identical opponents). As we move to the right, the wins come easier, and as we move up the event is more likely. The "event" is the team winning that many games or more. Consequently, lines curve up as we slide to the right - the probability of winning at least that many games increases as the games get easier. afghani topi , antique gold choker , embroidered patches for clothes , Afghani Style Shirt Handmade Embroidery , antique gold earrings designs with price , flapper head pieces , cardboard jewelry boxes , nishat linen scarf
ReplyDeleteThank you so much. 스웨디시 마사지
ReplyDeleteyeezy boost 350 v2
ReplyDeleteyeezy boost 350 v2
supreme clothing
longchamp outlet
air jordan
balenciaga
yeezy
kyrie 6
hermes handbags
yeezy 350
Choose a store which offers the best quality products within a reasonable amount and FDA approved, buycannabisonlineusa is helping how to get weed with or witout mmj card.Our mission is to provide a respectful and comfortable platform for our customers.
ReplyDelete스웨디시
ReplyDelete토렌트순위
ReplyDelete성인토렌트
무료웹하드
ReplyDeleteVery valuable information, it is not at all blogs that we find this, congratulations I was looking for something like that and found it here. 토토
ReplyDeletemy Instagram followers and I’m sure they’ll enjoy it as well. It’s an amazing lighting idea. 먹튀검증사이트
ReplyDeleteHowdy! This blog post couldn't be written much better! Going through this article reminds me of my previous roommate! 안전놀이터
ReplyDeleteYou actually explained this terrifically 먹튀검증
ReplyDelete공유해줘서 정말 좋은 글이에요. 그것은 정말로 내가 미래에 당신이 그렇게 훌륭한 직책을 공유하기를 바라는 희망입니다.우리카지노
ReplyDeleteGreat website. Lots of useful info here. I am sending it to a few
ReplyDeletefriends ans additionally sharing in delicious. 해외스포츠중계
I blog quite often and I genuinely appreciate your information. 바카라사이트
ReplyDeleteHowdy! This blog post couldn't be written much better! Going through this article reminds me of my previous roommate! 토토사이트
ReplyDeleteWe told him he was handsome.
ReplyDeleteTerri asked him if he was in the third grade.
토토사이트
green leaf express
ReplyDeleteThe cannabis has the active ingredients of a drug called Sativex and it is really effective in providing relief from the muscle spasms in multiple sclerosis.
It certainly has many other drugs among which are Nabilone that can be used to relieve sickness to the patients abiding by chemotherapy for cancer.
Researchers are keen to find ways to use cannabis-based drugs to make it beneficial for other medical conditions like eye disease, appetite loss in people with HIV OR AIDS and many more.
With so many benefactors lined no one can control crave for giving cannabis a shot? Get it from the GREEN EXPRESS DELIVERY and avail the options to Buy Canadian Mail Order Kief and Organic Kush Kief Online Canada.
Awesome work.Just wanted to drop a comment and say I am new to your blog and really like what I am reading.Thanks for the share 먹튀사이트
ReplyDeleteHey, I just hopped over to your site via StumbleUpon. Not something
ReplyDeleteI would normally read, but I liked your thoughts none the less.
Thanks for making something worth reading.
스포츠토토
Once I thought about things like: why such information is for free here? Because when you write a book then at least on selling a book you get a percentage. Thank you and good luck on informing people more about it… "buy Instagram followers"
ReplyDeleteKids Dress
ReplyDeleteParents have been wearing their babies for centuries in many cultures.And with all of the psychological and physical benefits that it provides for both the baby and the wearer, it’s no wonder why baby wearing is rapidly regaining popularity in many countries. When you think of baby wearing, you probably picture a mother doing chores with her baby all wrapped up in a woven cloth or shawl. And with all of the psychological and physical benefits that it provides for both the baby and the wearer, it’s no wonder why baby wearing is rapidly regaining popularity in many countries. When you think of baby wearing, you probably picture a mother doing chores with her baby all wrapped up in a woven cloth or shawl.
Hello, I read the post well. casino online It's a really interesting topic and it has helped me a lot. In fact, I also run a website with similar content to your posting. Please visit once
ReplyDeleteDispensary in DC
ReplyDeleteWe specialize in finding the right product for you. Each brand has been carefully curated by top farmers to provide you with the best experience.
Grown and tested by top labs in the country, our Spliff selection can be customized for any need and palette.