Sugar Bowl
Florida vs Louisville
Florida -14
If we look solely at resumes, Florida is easily the most accomplished team in the country. The Gators own impressive road wins over Texas A&M, Vanderbilt, and Florida State. At home they have beaten LSU and blown out South Carolina. Even their non-conference wins over non-BCS opponents have come against solid teams (Bowling Green and Louisiana-Lafayette). However, based on the eye test, and backed up by the stats, Florida may be elite team with the smallest margin for error. The Gators ranked just twelfth in the SEC on offense, ahead of a pair of teams that endured winless conference seasons (Auburn and Kentucky). That is actually lower than they ranked during their forgettable 2011 campaign when they ranked eighth in the SEC on in that category. The Gators did improve on defense, moving up from fifth in 2011 to an elite second in 2012. For the season, only Vanderbilt gained more than 350 yards against the Gators and only Louisiana-Lafayette averaged north of five yards per play. The Gators posted a pair of shutouts and held four other teams to just one offensive touchdown. The defense also continually put the struggling offense in prime position to score by forcing 29 turnovers (16th in the nation). That more than doubled their effort from 2011 when they forced just 14. Florida will attempt to take the ball away from a Louisville team coached by a familiar face. Charlie Strong was the Gators defensive coordinator from 2002-2009 and actually coached the team in the 2004 Peach Bowl. Strong has engineered quite a turnaround at Louisville, leading a team that had missed out on the postseason for three consecutive years to three straight bowls, and winning a pair of shared Big East titles in 2011 and 2012. Behind quarterback Teddy Bridgewater, the Cardinals posted the second best offense in the Big East. Bridgewater threw 25 touchdown passes on the year, the most by a Louisville quarterback since Brian Brohm was fooling folks into thinking he could be an NFL starter. If Louisville does not turn the ball over, this game could be very interesting. Florida relies on their defense and special teams to generate favorable scoring opportunities (similar to Jim Tressel's vintage Ohio State teams). Bridgewater is the type of accurate quarterback who could keep Louisville in this game against an elite defense by avoiding turnovers. However, even if Louisville plays a perfect game and doesn't commit a turnover, its hard to imagine them scoring more than two offensive touchdowns. I don't trust Florida to cover this large number, but under no circumstances would I advise you to lay any money on Louisville either.
Fiesta Bowl
Oregon vs Kansas State
Oregon -9
About six weeks ago, this was the presumed national championship game. Then both Kansas State and Oregon lost on the same night. Kansas State was blown out at Baylor, while the Ducks had their wings clipped at home by a powerful Stanford defense. Both teams rebounded from their respective defeats to easily win their season finales. Oregon beat their arch-rival Oregon State by 24 points and Kansas State beat Texas by 18. The win for Oregon locked up at at-large BCS bowl bid for the Ducks (their fourth straight such bid), but actually ended their run of conference titles at three in a row. For Kansas State, their win locked up just their second Big 12 title and first since 2003. Both teams boasted phenomenal turnover margins in their respective conferences. Oregon was +21 in their nine conference games, powered by an incredible 33 forced turnovers from their defense, while Kansas State was +19 in their nine Big 12 games thanks to just seven turnovers committed (nearly half of those --3-- came in their loss to Baylor). Not surprisingly, Oregon led the Pac-12 offense, cranking out over 530 yards per game against their league foes. The defense held its own as well, ranking a respectable fifth in the league. Outside of their loss to Stanford, when they scored just 14 points, the Ducks scored at least 43 points in each game! Head coach Chip Kelly plugged in a new starting quarterback (freshman Marcus Mariota) and the offense did not miss a beat. Mariota threw 30 touchdown passes, and also rushed for nearly 700 yards (690). While Oregon was led by a freshman under center, Kansas State relied on the play of a senior quarterback to post one of the best seasons in school history. Collin Klein, a Heisman Trophy finalist, threw 15 touchdown passes, but ran for 22, ranking fourth in the nation in rushing touchdowns one season after running for 27. With a good game on the ground, Klein could also top 1000 yards rushing for the second straight year (he currently has 895). I've made no secret of my affinity for Bill Snyder, so my view of this game is probably a bit tainted. Oregon is probably the better team, and this game certainly has blowout potential if Kansas State falls behind by say two scores or so, but my heart says the Wildcats hang with the Ducks.
Cotton Bowl
Texas A&M vs Oklahoma
Texas A&M -3
Oklahoma head coach Bob Stoops may deserve a Heisman vote after this season. His Sooners have already faced two of the Heisman finalists, Manti Te'O and Collin Klein, and now they get Hesiman winner Johnny Manziel in the Cotton Bowl. Stoops and Oklahoma fans hope this outcome is different from the first two against the other Heisman finalists. Those games both resulted in Oklahoma defeats, at home no less! On the season Oklahoma was well-balanced, ranking third on both offense and defense in the Big 12, and statistically rating out as the best team in the conference. Oft-criticized senior quarterback Landry Jones threw 29 touchdown passes, bringing his career total to a robust 122. Oklahoma did not have a 1000-yard receiver for the first time since 2007 (Kenny Stills has 897 so he could reach that number), but three Sooner receivers gained at least 750 yards and four caught at least 40 passes. The offensive line did a fine job giving Jones time to throw to those receivers, allowing just 14 sacks on the season which ranked 18th in the nation. The Sooners will attempt to win their fourth consecutive bowl game against a familiar foe. Until this season, Oklahoma and Texas A&M were division rivals in the Big 12, playing each season from 1996-2011. As you may have heard, the Aggies moved to the powerful SEC and acquitted themselves quite well this season, posting a 10-2 mark. Redshirt freshman Johnny Manziel won the Heisman Trophy passing for over 3000 yards and rushing for nearly 1200 and accounting for 43 total touchdowns. His exploits helped power the Aggies to the top-ranked offense in the SEC. However, the other side of the ball was a different story, as the Aggies were a below-average eighth on defense. Of course the defense did have its share of playmakers, led by defensive end Damontre Moore who tallied 12.5 sacks (sixth in the nation). Unfortunately, at times it seemed like he was a one-man wrecking crew on that side of the ball as no other player had more than 2.5 sacks. Outside of the BCS National Championship Game, this is one of the bowl games I am most looking forward to, and I think Oklahoma is a solid play here. Under Bob Stoops, the Sooners are 11-2 against Texas A&M and while the Sooners may have under-achieved relative to their perennial sky-high expectations, they are still a very good team. Texas A&M is a little over-valued here, so take the Sooners plus the points.
BBVA Compass Bowl
Ole Miss vs Pitt
Ole Miss -3.5
Pitt fans probably do not need a BBVA Compass to find their way to this bowl game. This will mark the third straight year Pitt has ended their season in Birmingham meaning Pitt has participated in every iteration of this bowl game since BBVA Compass took over the sponsorship from Papa John's. The Panthers have split their previous two trips, handling Kentucky 27-10 two years ago, and losing to SMU 28-6 last year. This will be their first trip to Birmingham where their head coach in the bowl is the same as their head coach during the regular season. Dave Wannstedt was relieved of his duties prior to the Kentucky game and Todd Graham bolted for Arizona State prior to last year's clash with SMU. Head coach Paul Chryst has done a fine job motivating the Pitt team. The Panthers began the year with an embarrassing loss to IAA Youngstown State and followed that up with a loss to Cincinnati to fall to 0-2. They won their next two before again dropping two conference games to stand at 2-4 and 0-3 in the Big East at the season's halfway point. They won two more game to get back to .500 before blowing a late double-digit lead at Notre Dame. Still experiencing a bit of a hangover, the Panthers lost at Connecticut six days later to fall to 4-6, needing wins in their final two games to attain bowl eligibility for the fifth straight season. The Panthers crushed Big East leading Rutgers and a South Florida team playing out the string by a combined score of 54-9 to get to six wins. The Panthers will take on another 6-6 team playing under a rookie head coach. After going just 1-15 in the SEC during Houston Nutt's final two seasons, the Rebels won three conference games under Hugh Freeze and had opportunities to win several more, losing by three to Texas A&M, by a single point to Vanderbilt, and by six at LSU. This will be the Rebels first bowl game since 2009, and they will seek to win their fifth consecutive bowl, having not lost in the postseason since the 2000 Music City Bowl. Ole Miss was decidedly average on both sides of the ball in the SEC, ranking sixth on offense and seventh on defense. However, in a league with powerhouses like Alabama, Florida, Georgia, LSU, South Carolina, and Texas A&M, those middling numbers are not so bad. Quarterback Bo Wallace made his share of mistakes (his 15 interceptions were among the worst by starting quarterbacks), but he also provided a big-play threat, averaging 8.5 yards per pass (good for 14th in the nation). By my estimation, Ole Miss is a shade over-valued thanks to playing in the rugged SEC. The only bowl team they beat was in-state rival Mississippi State. Their other scalps included Arkansas and Auburn in the conference, and Central Arkansas, UTEP, and Tulane outside the league. Meanwhile, Pitt's national perception is still suffering thanks to their opening loss to Youngstown State. However, the Panthers could have easily won eight or nine games, but were 0-3 in one-score contests. The spread seems like it should be reversed. When you break things down, Pitt really has the better resume. Look for the Panthers to cover here, and if you are feeling really ambitious, take them on the moneyline.
GoDaddy.com Bowl
Arkansas State vs Kent State
Arkansas St -4
Both these mid-majors are victims of their own success. Arkansas State won their second consecutive Sun Belt title, and lost their second consecutive coach to an SEC program. Guz Malzahn followed the trail blazed by Hugh Freeze from Jonesboro, Arkansas to the SEC West. The Red Wolves boasted the second best offense in the Sun Belt and the third best defense. The offense was led by senior quarterback Ryan Aplin (I'm all for dubbing this team The Aplin Dumpling Gang), who threw 23 touchdown passes and just four interceptions while rushing for 443 yards. Playing in his final game, Aplin will leave as the school's all-time leading passer and will seek to get the Red Wolves their first ever bowl win in their third bowl appearance. With Malzahn off to Auburn, the Red Wolves will be coached by defensive coordinator John Thompson (no, not that John Thompson). Thompson was the head coach at East Carolina from 2003-2004 and won just three games during his tenure. On the other sideline, Kent State enjoyed their most successful season in school history, winning a school-record eleven games, entering the AP Poll for the first time, and qualifying for just their second bowl game. That success resulted in head coach Darrell Hazell being hired away by Purdue. First off, let me just say 'Hooray for Hazel', as he is sticking around to coach the Golden Flashes in their first bowl game since 1972. Kent State has a pair of 1000-yard rushers in Trayion Durham and Dri Archer. Both rushed for over 1200 yards and combined for 29 touchdowns on the ground. Durham was a typical running back, averaging 4.88 yards per carry, bur Archer made defenses quiver, averaging an incredible 9.01 yards per rush. Archer also had the most catches (35), receiving yards (539), and receiving touchdowns (4) on the team. He also returned three kickoffs for touchdowns and threw a touchdown pass against Army. He is a true do-everything player. Defensively, the Golden Flashes were very opportunistic, leading the nation with 38 forced turnovers. As a team, Kent State intercepted 23 passes and scored five defensive touchdowns. Those explosive plays helped prop up a team that was solid, but hardly elite on a down-to-down basis (fifth on offense and fourth on defense in the MAC). There doesn't appear to be any value in this line, but if forced to make a play here, I might take the Golden Flashes on the moneyline. Arkansas State is captained by an interim coach and just played in this same bowl game last season. Meanwhile, Kent State has their coach for one more game and is playing in their first bowl game in 40 years. Motivation could certainly be an issue here.
BCS National Championship
Alabama vs Notre Dame
Alabama -9
By now, I'm not going to be able to tell you anything about this game that you didn't already know. Two of the most storied programs in the game will meet for the sport's biggest prize. Some think this tilt of titans could break ratings records. I for one, am much more intrigued by this game than I was by last year's rematch between division rivals. I also happen to think the spread in this game is terribly wrong. Sure Notre Dame squeaked by a lot of teams this season, winning five games by a touchdown or fewer. But check out that seven-game stretch in the middle of the season: @ Michigan State, Michigan, vs Miami, Stanford, BYU, @ Oklahoma, and Pitt. Those seven teams range from good to very good. Plus don't forget the Irish ended the season with a cross-country road trip to Southern Cal. And there is some precedent for winning a few nailbiters. Remember Auburn from just two seasons ago? Seven of their fourteen wins came by eight points or fewer. As I recall, no one was questioning their championship credentials. I'll leave you with this, Notre Dame has given up just nine offensive touchdowns in their twelve games. I don't care who you play, that is pretty damn impressive. Despite playing their home games in Indiana, Notre Dame is an SEC team. If they had a rooster, a pig, a big G or an orange T on their helmets, fans all across the south would be living vicariously through this elite defense. I love the Irish catching nearly double-digits here.
BPR | A system for ranking teams based only one wins and losses and strength of schedule. See BPR for an explanation. |
EPA (Expected Points Added) | Expected points are the points a team can "expect" to score based on the distance to the end zone and down and distance needed for a first down, with an adjustment for the amount of time remaining in some situations. Expected points for every situation is estimated using seven years of historical data. The expected points considers both the average points the offense scores in each scenario and the average number of points the other team scores on their ensuing possession. The Expected Points Added is the change in expected points before and after a play. |
EP3 (Effective Points Per Possession) | Effective Points Per Possession is based on the same logic as the EPA, except it focuses on the expected points added at the beginning and end of an offensive drive. In other words, the EP3 for a single drive is equal to the sum of the expected points added for every offensive play in a drive (EP3 does not include punts and field goal attempts). We can also think of the EP3 as points scored+expected points from a field goal+the value of field position change on the opponent's next possession. |
Adjusted for Competition | We attempt to adjust some statistics to compensate for differences in strength of schedule. While the exact approach varies some from stat to stat the basic concept is the same. We use an algorithm to estimate scores for all teams on both sides of the ball (e.g., offense and defense) that best predict real results. For example, we give every team an offensive and defensive yards per carry score. Subtracting the offensive score from the defensive score for two opposing teams will estimate the yards per carry if the two teams were to play. Generally, the defensive scores average to zero while offensive scores average to the national average, e.g., yards per carry, so we call the offensive score "adjusted for competition" and roughly reflects what the team would do against average competition |
Impact | see Adjusted for Competition. Impact scores are generally used to evaluate defenses. The value roughly reflects how much better or worse a team can expect to do against this opponent than against the average opponent. |
[-] About this table
Includes the
top 180 QBs by total plays
Total <=0 | Percent of plays that are negative or no gain |
Total >=10 | Percent of plays that gain 10 or more yards |
Total >=25 | Percent of plays that gain 25 or more yards |
10 to 0 | Ratio of Total >=10 to Total <=0 |
Includes the
top 240 RBs by total plays
Total <=0 | Percent of plays that are negative or no gain |
Total >=10 | Percent of plays that gain 10 or more yards |
Total >=25 | Percent of plays that gain 25 or more yards |
10 to 0 | Ratio of Total >=10 to Total <=0 |
Includes the
top 300 Receivers by total plays
Total <=0 | Percent of plays that are negative or no gain |
Total >=10 | Percent of plays that gain 10 or more yards |
Total >=25 | Percent of plays that gain 25 or more yards |
10 to 0 | Ratio of Total >=10 to Total <=0 |
Includes
the
top 180 players by pass attempts)
3rdLComp% |
Completion % on 3rd and long (7+
yards) |
SitComp% |
Standardized completion % for
down and distance. Completion % by down and distance are weighted by
the national average of pass plays by down and distance. |
Pass <=0 | Percent of pass plays that are negative or no gain |
Pass >=10 | Percent of pass plays that gain 10 or more yards |
Pass >=25 | Percent of pass plays that gain 25 or more yards |
10 to 0 | Ratio of Pass >=10 to Pass<=0 |
%Sacks |
Ratio of sacks to pass plays |
Bad INTs |
Interceptions on 1st or 2nd down
early before the last minute of the half |
Includes the top 240 players by carries
YPC1stD |
Yards per carry on 1st down |
CPCs |
Conversions (1st down/TD) per
carry in short yardage situations - the team 3 or fewer yards for a 1st
down or touchdown |
%Team Run |
Player's carries as a percent of team's carries |
%Team RunS |
Player's carries as a percent of team's carries in short
yardage situations |
Run <=0 |
Percent of running plays that
are negative or no gain |
Run >=10 |
Percent of running plays that
gain 10 or more yards |
Run >=25 | Percent of running plays that gain 25 or more yards |
10 to 0 | Ratio of Run >=10 to Run <=0 |
Includes the top 300 players by targets
Conv/T 3rd | Conversions per target on 3rd Downs |
Conv/T PZ | Touchdowns per target inside the 10 yardline |
%Team PZ | Percent of team's targets inside the 10 yardline |
Rec <=0 | Percent of targets that go for negative yards or no net gain |
Rec >=10 | Percent of targets that go for 10+ yards |
Rec >=25 | Percent of targets that go for 25+ yards |
10 to 0 | Ratio of Rec>=0 to Rec<=0 |
Includes the top 300 players by targets
xxxx | xxxx |
...
Includes players with a significant number of attempts
NEPA | "Net Expected Points Added": (expected points after play - expected points before play)-(opponent's expected points after play - opponent's expected points before play). Uses the expected points for the current possession and the opponent's next possession based on down, distance and spot |
NEPA/PP | Average NEPA per play |
Max/Min | Single game high and low |
Includes players with a significant number of attempts
NEPA | "Net Expected Points Added": (expected points after play - expected points before play)-(opponent's expected points after play - opponent's expected points before play). Uses the expected points for the current possession and the opponent's next possession based on down, distance and spot |
NEPA/PP | Average NEPA per play |
Max/Min | Single game high and low |
Adjusted | Reports the per game EPA adjusted for the strength of schedule. |
Defensive Possession Stats
Points/Poss | Offensive points per possession |
EP3 | Effective Points per Possession |
EP3+ | Effective Points per Possession impact |
Plays/Poss | Plays per possession |
Yards/Poss | Yards per possession |
Start Spot | Average starting field position |
Time of Poss | Average time of possession (in seconds) |
TD/Poss | Touchdowns per possession |
TO/Poss | Turnovers per possession |
FGA/Poss | Attempted field goals per possession |
%RZ | Red zone trips per possession |
Points/RZ | Average points per red zone trip. Field Goals are included using expected points, not actual points. |
TD/RZ | Touchdowns per red zone trip |
FGA/RZ | Field goal attempt per red zone trip |
Downs/RZ | Turnover on downs per red zone trip |
Defensive Play-by-Play Stats
EPA/Pass | Expected Points Added per pass attempt |
EPA/Rush | Expected Points Added per rush attempt |
EPA/Pass+ | Expected Points Added per pass attempt impact |
EPA/Rush+ | Expected Points Added per rush attempt impact |
Yards/Pass | Yards per pass |
Yards/Rush | Yards per rush |
Yards/Pass+ | Yards per pass impact |
Yards/Rush+ | Yards per rush impact |
Exp/Pass | Explosive plays (25+ yards) per pass |
Exp/Rush | Explosive plays (25+ yards) per rush |
Exp/Pass+ | Explosive plays (25+ yards) per pass impact |
Exp/Rush+ | Explosive plays (25+ yards) per rush impact |
Comp% | Completion percentage |
Comp%+ | Completion percentage impact |
Yards/Comp | Yards per completion |
Sack/Pass | Sacks per pass |
Sack/Pass+ | Sacks per pass impact |
Sack/Pass* | Sacks per pass on passing downs |
INT/Pass | Interceptions per pass |
Neg/Rush | Negative plays (<=0) per rush |
Neg/Run+ | Negative plays (<=0) per rush impact |
Run Short | % Runs in short yardage situations |
Convert% | 3rd/4th down conversions |
Conv%* | 3rd/4th down conversions versus average by distance |
Conv%+ | 3rd/4th down conversions versus average by distance impact |
Offensive Play-by-Play Stats
Plays | Number of offensive plays |
%Pass | Percent pass plays |
EPA/Pass | Expected Points Added per pass attempt |
EPA/Rush | Expected Points Added per rush attempt |
EPA/Pass+ | Expected Points Added per pass attempt adjusted for competition |
EPA/Rush+ | Expected Points Added per rush attempt adjusted for competition |
Yards/Pass | Yards per pass |
Yards/Rush | Yards per rush |
Yards/Pass+ | Yards per pass adjusted for competition |
Yards/Rush+ | Yards per rush adjusted for competition |
Exp Pass | Explosive plays (25+ yards) per pass |
Exp Run | Explosive plays (25+ yards) per rush |
Exp Pass+ | Explosive plays (25+ yards) per pass adjusted for competition |
Exp Run+ | Explosive plays (25+ yards) per rush adjusted for competition |
Comp% | Completion percentage |
Comp%+ | Completion percentage adjusted for competition |
Sack/Pass | Sacks per pass |
Sack/Pass+ | Sacks per pass adjusted for competition |
Sack/Pass* | Sacks per pass on passing downs |
Int/Pass | Interceptions per pass |
Neg/Run | Negative plays (<=0) per rush |
Neg/Run+ | Negative plays (<=0) per rush adjusted for competition |
Run Short | % Runs in short yardage situations |
Convert% | 3rd/4th down conversions |
Conv%* | 3rd/4th down conversions versus average by distance |
Conv%+ | 3rd/4th down conversions versus average by distance adjusted for competition |
Offensive Possession Stats
Points/Poss | Offensive points per possession |
EP3 | Effective Points per Possession |
EP3+ | Effective Points per Possession adjusted for competition |
Plays/Poss | Plays per possession |
Yards/Poss | Yards per possession |
Start Spot | Average starting field position |
Time of Poss | Average time of possession (in seconds) |
TD/Poss | Touchdowns per possession |
TO/Poss | Turnovers per possession |
FGA/Poss | Attempted field goals per possession |
Poss/Game | Possessions per game |
%RZ | Red zone trips per possession |
Points/RZ | Average points per red zone trip. Field Goals are included using expected points, not actual points. |
TD/RZ | Touchdowns per red zone trip |
FGA/RZ | Field goal attempt per red zone trip |
Downs/RZ | Turnover on downs per red zone trip |
PPP | Points per Possession |
aPPP | Points per Possession allowed |
PPE | Points per Exchange (PPP-aPPP) |
EP3+ | Expected Points per Possession |
aEP3+ | Expected Points per Possession allowed |
EP2E+ | Expected Points per Exchange |
EPA/Pass+ | Expected Points Added per Pass |
EPA/Rush+ | Expected Points Added per Rush |
aEPA/Pass+ | Expected Points Allowed per Pass |
aEPA/Rush+ | Expected Points Allowed per Rush |
Exp/Pass | Explosive Plays per Pass |
Exp/Rush | Explosive Plays per Rush |
aExp/Pass | Explosive Plays per Pass allowed |
aExp/Rush | Explosive Plays per Rush allowed |
BPR | A method for ranking conferences based only on their wins and losses and the strength of schedule. See BPR for an explanation. |
Power | A composite measure that is the best predictor of future game outcomes, averaged across all teams in the conference |
P-Top | The power ranking of the top teams in the conference |
P-Mid | The power ranking of the middling teams in the conference |
P-Bot | The power ranking of the worst teams in the conference |
SOS-Und | Strength of Schedule - Undefeated. Focuses on the difficulty of going undefeated, averaged across teams in the conference |
SOS-BE | Strength of Schedule - Bowl Eligible. Focuses on the difficulty of becoming bowl eligible, averaged across teams in the conference |
Hybrid | A composite measure that quantifies human polls, applied to converences |
Player Game Log
Use the yellow, red and green cells to filter values. Yellow cells filter for exact matches, green cells for greater values and red cells for lesser values. By default, the table is filtered to only the top 200 defense-independent performances (oEPA). The table includes the 5,000 most important performances (positive and negative) by EPA.
Use the yellow, red and green cells to filter values. Yellow cells filter for exact matches, green cells for greater values and red cells for lesser values. By default, the table is filtered to only the top 200 defense-independent performances (oEPA). The table includes the 5,000 most important performances (positive and negative) by EPA.
EPA | Expected points added (see glossary) |
oEPA | Defense-independent performance |
Team Game Log
Use the yellow, red and green cells to filter values. Yellow cells filter for exact matches, green cells for greater values and red cells for lesser values.
Use the yellow, red and green cells to filter values. Yellow cells filter for exact matches, green cells for greater values and red cells for lesser values.
EP3 | Effective points per possession (see glossary) |
oEP3 | Defense-independent offensive performance |
dEP3 | Offense-independent defensive performance |
EPA | Expected points added (see glossary) |
oEPA | Defense-independent offensive performance |
dEPA | Offense-independent defensive performance |
EPAp | Expected points added per play |
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment